Current process
Definition v1.7.0 passed OMG BPMN 2.0.2 and Sanctum Flow validation.
18 top-level activities
14 drill-down activities
Invoice Approval Process
This Invoice Approval reference exposes preparation, exception and approval delay before comparing faster operation with a separately validated future-state process. Sanctum Chat is the process-analysis assistant used to structure source knowledge; Sanctum Flow validates, presents and tests the BPMN.
Start with a document or a short conversation. No BPMN knowledge required.
Approval waiting dominates the baseline scenario. The page keeps faster operating assumptions distinct from straight-through process redesign and discloses the limits of both.
Executive finding
The baseline P95 is nearly three times its median, and sequential approval review contributes about 97% of simulated elapsed time under these assumptions.
Priority: Measure approval-age bands and escalate only when the defined SLA is at risk.
Definition v1.7.0 passed OMG BPMN 2.0.2 and Sanctum Flow validation.
18 top-level activities
14 drill-down activities
Directional synthetic elapsed-time scenario, not measured client performance.
Separate future-state BPMN v2.0.0 with explicit structural changes and retained scope.
0.18h future median
Live Process Lab
The definition below is served by Sanctum Flow. It is not copied into this website. Use its Definition, Baseline simulation, Operating improvement, Process redesign and Evidence views to inspect the same versioned showcase bundle.
Scope: Invoice receipt through control validation, approval decision and posting to the payment queue. Excludes: Payment execution, bank settlement and remittance advice.
Sanctum Flow · Invoice Approval Process v1.7.0
Open full screenSequential review, exception handling and approval waiting compound at higher volumes.
Faster routing and exception-focused review reduce waiting while retaining the same control points.
What changes in the operating improvement
The validated BPMN control design stays fixed. Only these disclosed synthetic operating assumptions change:
Process redesign
A separately validated future-state definition automates intake and controls, permits straight-through approval only after a positive fail-closed eligibility decision, routes exceptions to people, escalates unresolved review after four hours, and seals approval evidence before posting.
As-is v1.7.0 → Future state v2.0.0 · Same scope and exclusions · Separate validated BPMN artifact
Capture, validate, match, and classify invoices before they enter human work queues.
Control impact
Mandatory, duplicate, tax, supplier, matching, and tolerance controls remain explicit and auditable.
Only invoices with positive eligibility evidence bypass human approval; every ambiguous result defaults to review.
Control impact
The automated decision and policy version are sealed in the approval record.
Approvers receive only non-eligible invoices, together with the failed eligibility reasons.
Control impact
Accountability remains with the delegated approver while routine work no longer consumes the queue.
A four-hour interrupting SLA escalates overdue exceptions, and approval evidence is integrity-checked before posting.
Control impact
Escalation and posting retain a complete, immutable decision trail.
These are precomputed, synthetic, directional results. They are not a client forecast. Elapsed cycle time is not used in the labour-value calculator below.
What the scenario exposes
A diagram explains the control flow. Scenario analysis shows where waiting and manual work accumulate, so improvement decisions can be tested rather than guessed.
Finding 1
The baseline P95 is nearly three times its median, and sequential approval review contributes about 97% of simulated elapsed time under these assumptions.
Test next
Measure approval-age bands and escalate only when the defined SLA is at risk.
Finding 2
Low-risk, matched invoices consume review capacity when they follow the same operating path as anomalies.
Test next
Apply straight-through controls to routine invoices and direct human attention to mismatches and policy exceptions.
Finding 3
An absent or ambiguous approval-matrix result must never fall through to policy auto-approval.
Test next
Require a positive auto-approval eligibility decision and route every other invoice to human review by default.
Finding 4
Elapsed cycle time and staff touch time answer different questions; combining them would overstate savings.
Test next
Use simulation for flow performance and the transparent calculator for labour-value scenarios.
Who this is for
Invoice approval is a finance process, a control system and a supplier experience. Each audience needs a different answer from the same evidence.
See how approval waiting affects cycle time and where a redesigned control model could change the economics.
Inspect preparation, matching, exception, approval and posting controls without losing the operational detail.
Compare same-process operating improvement with a separately validated straight-through future state.
Explore your own volume
This calculator models labour capacity using the assumptions you enter. It is separate from the elapsed-time simulation above and does not include implementation cost.
Illustrative only. This is not a quote, guarantee or financial forecast.
Share a non-confidential SOP, operating manual or explain the work conversationally.
Sanctum Chat asks about actors, decisions, exceptions, controls, timing and missing outcomes.
Sanctum Flow checks the definition, renders it and runs disclosed operating scenarios.
3/3 controlled generation benchmark
Three isolated Sanctum Chat runs converted the same synthetic SOP into new draft definitions. Every run passed the pinned source contract and independent Sanctum Flow checks. The displayed v1.7.0 showcase remains the curated reference model; it is not represented as one of the generated benchmark drafts.
Evidence before claims
Employee claim capture, policy and exception assessment, manager review, controls and audit, reimbursement recovery, notification and record retention.
View model →Vendor invoice capture, 2-way/3-way matching, payment run generation, remittance advice, and early payment discount handling.
Purchase request creation, budget validation, PO approval, vendor confirmation, and goods receipt matching.
Start with one process
Tell us what the process does and where it hurts. We will arrange a secure way to review source documents after qualification.